The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 156, Issue 4 , Pages 634-638 , April 2010

High Flow Nasal Cannulae Therapy in Infants with Bronchiolitis

  • Christine McKiernan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Baystate Children's Hospital, Springfield, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Lee Chadrick Chua, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey
  • ,
  • Paul F. Visintainer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Division of Academic Affairs, Baystate Health System, Springfield, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Holley Allen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Baystate Children's Hospital, Springfield, Massachusetts

Received 29 April 2009 ,Revised 19 August 2009 ,Accepted 29 October 2009.

References 

  1. Martinón-Torres F, Rodriguez-Núñez A, Martinón-Sánchez JM. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure with heliox versus air oxygen in infants with acute bronchiolitis: a crossover study. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e1190–e1195
  2. Thia LP, McKenzie SA, Blyth TP, Minasian CC, Kozlowska WJ, Carr SB. Randomised controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:637–638
  3. Larrar S, Essouri S, Durand P, Chevret L, Haas V, Chabernaud JL, et al. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in infants with severe acute bronchiolitis. Archives de Pediatrie. 2006;13:1397–1403
  4. Soong WJ, Hwang B, Tang RB. Continuous positive airway pressure by nasal prongs in bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993;16:163–166
  5. Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F480–F483
  6. Miller JD, Carlo WA. Pulmonary complications of mechanical ventilation in neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:273–281
  7. Waugh JB. High flow oxygen delivery. Clinical Foundations. Available at http://www.clinicalfoundations.org/foundations3.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2009.
  8. de Klerk A. Humidified high-flow nasal cannula: is it the new and improved CPAP?. Adv Neonatal Care. 2008;8:98–106
  9. Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnell RA. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure?. Pediatrics. 2008;121:82–88
  10. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Mammel MC. Observational study of humidified high flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr. 2009;154:177–182
  11. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1081–1083
  12. Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, McGonigle R, Kilani RA. High flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. J Perinatol. 2007;27:772–775
  13. Campbell DM, Shah PS, Shah V, Kelly EN. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26:546–549
  14. Holleman-Duray D, Kaupie D, Weiss MG. Heated humidified high flow nasal cannula: use and a neonatal early extubation protocol. J Perinatol. 2007;27:776–781
  15. Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, DiGeronimo RJ. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol. 2007;27:85–91
  16. Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G. PIM2: A revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:278–285
  17. Saslow JG, Aghai ZH, Nakhla TA, Hart JJ, Lawrysh R, Stahl GE, et al. Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26:476–479
  18. Lain DC, Lain C, Waugh JB. Average temperature and flow using Vapotherm in an adult population. Chest Suppl. 2004;126:899S

 The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

PII: S0022-3476(09)01084-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.039

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 156, Issue 4 , Pages 634-638 , April 2010