The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 156, Issue 2 , Pages 247-252.e1, February 2010

Metabolic Risk Varies According to Waist Circumference Measurement Site in Overweight Boys and Girls

  • Steven T. Johnson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Jennifer L. Kuk, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Kelly A. Mackenzie, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Centre for Weight and Health, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Terry T-K. Huang, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Obesity Research Strategic Core, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD
  • ,
  • Rhonda J. Rosychuk, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Geoff D.C. Ball, PhD, RD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Pediatric Centre for Weight and Health, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Geoff D. C. Ball, PhD, RD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Room 8228, Aberhart Centre, 11402 University Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada.

Received 15 April 2009; received in revised form 24 June 2009; accepted 12 August 2009. published online 28 October 2009.

Objectives

To compare waist circumference (WC) values measured at 4 commonly recommended sites and examine the relationships between WC sites and markers of metabolic risk in a sample of overweight boys and girls referred for weight management.

Study design

Overweight (mean body mass index percentile, 98.7; SD, 1.0) children and adolescents (n = 73; 41 girls, 32 boys; mean age, 12.5 years; SD, 2.6 years) had WC measured at 4 sites: iliac crest (WC1), narrowest waist (WC2), midpoint between the floating rib and iliac crest (WC3), and umbilicus (WC4). Height, weight, fasting insulin level, glucose level, cholesterol level, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also measured.

Results

Overall, WC1 (108.5 cm; SD, 16.3 cm) was greater than WC2 (97.4 cm; SD, 13.6 cm; P < .003), and WC2 was smaller than WC3 (104.3 cm; SD, 15.3 cm; P = .02) and WC4 (108.7 cm; SD, 16.2 cm; P < .0003). With logistic regression, WC2 and WC3 were revealed to be more consistently associated with metabolic syndrome by using 3 different definitions.

Conclusion

In our sample, we observed differences in 4 commonly recommended WC measurement sites and found that all sites were not equivalently associated with metabolic risk. Our findings provide preliminary support suggesting that WC measured at the narrowest waist and midpoint between the floating rib and iliac crest may represent the measurement sites most closely associated with metabolic risk in overweight boys and girls.

BMI, Body mass index, CVD, Cardiovascular disease, DBP, Diastolic blood pressure, HOMA-IR, Homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance, HDL, High density lipoprotein, IDF, International diabetes federation, LDL, Low density lipoprotein, MetS, Metabolic syndrome, NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program, NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, OR, Odds ratio, PCWH, Pediatric Centre for Weight and Health, SBP, Systolic blood pressure, T2DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, WC, Wasist circumference

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a Research Trainee Grant (awarded to Dr Johnson) from the Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Dr Rosychuk is supported by a Population Health Investigator (PHI) Award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR). Dr Ball is supported by a PHI from AHFMR and a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Contents of this paper do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the US National Institutes of Health. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

PII: S0022-3476(09)00791-4

doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.08.010

Refers to article:

  • Measurement Matters

    Mary Horlick, Mary L. Hediger
    The Journal of Pediatrics February 2010 (Vol. 156, Issue 2, Pages 178-179)

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 156, Issue 2 , Pages 247-252.e1, February 2010