The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 155, Issue 5 , Pages 721-727, November 2009

An 8-Year Follow-up Study of Profiles and Predictors of Methylphenidate Use in a Nationwide Sample of Boys

  • Elisa Romano, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dr Elisa Romano, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5.
  • ,
  • Stacey Thornhill, BA

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
  • ,
  • Éric Lacourse, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sociology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

Received 15 August 2008; received in revised form 16 April 2009; accepted 18 May 2009. published online 30 July 2009.

Objectives

To identify methylphenidate profiles over several years in a national sample of boys and examine behavioral and sociodemographic predictors of use.

Study design

Five cycles of a Canadian survey were used, resulting in 1447 boys followed from 2 to 3 years to 10 to 11 years. Mother reports of boys' methylphenidate use from 4 to 5 years to 10 to 11 years were used to identify profiles over time. Mother-reported sociodemographic and child behavior data at 2 to 3 years were then used to predict methylphenidate profiles.

Results

Three methylphenidate profiles were identified: no use (87.2%); slow-rising, intermittent (11.2%); and fast-rising, stable (1.6%). Sociodemographic variables were not significant predictors. Boys with greater hyperactivity-impulsivity, greater inattention, and less disruptive behavior were more likely to belong to the fast-rising, stable methylphenidate profile. Although 13% of boys were using methylphenidate over time, there were 2 heterogeneous profiles. In the first profile, there were very few initial users followed by a steady increase in the number of boys using methylphenidate over time. Among these boys, however, use was inconsistent over time. In the second profile, there was a sharp onset of methylphenidate use on school entry, followed by consistent use thereafter.

Conclusions

These findings have implications for the treatment effectiveness of attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder symptoms. It is important to continue examining the role of disruptive behavior because its co-occurrence with attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder symptoms and methylphenidate use is complex.

ADHD, Attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder, LFS, Statistics Canada's Labor Force Survey, NLSCY, National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented as a poster at the annual convention of the Canadian Psychological Association in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 8 to 10, 2006, and supported in part by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada – Initiatives on the New Economy: Raising and Leveling the Bar (#512-2003-1016, E.R. and É.L.). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

PII: S0022-3476(09)00507-1

doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.05.028

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 155, Issue 5 , Pages 721-727, November 2009