Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 155, Issue 4, Pages 556-559 (October 2009)


View previous. 34 of 54 View next.

The Role of Abdominal Radiography in the Diagnosis of Intussusception When Interpreted by Pediatric Emergency Physicians

Jessica Morrison, MDCMa, Nathalie Lucas, MD, FRCPb, Jocelyn Gravel, MD, FRCP, MScb

Received 16 December 2008; received in revised form 12 February 2009; accepted 5 April 2009. published online 29 June 2009.

Objective

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of abdominal x-rays in the diagnosis of intussusception when interpreted by pediatric emergency physicians.

Study design

This was a prospective experimental study. Participants were board-certified/eligible pediatric emergency physicians. They evaluated a module containing radiographs of 50 cases of intussusception and 50 controls, matched for age and sex. For each x-ray, the physicians stated whether the x-ray increased, decreased or did not affect suspicion of intussusception. The primary outcome was the percentage of cases for which physicians stated that the x-ray increased their level of suspicion (sensitivity). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of false-negative results and specificity.

Results

Fourteen of 15 eligible physicians participated in the study. Overall, abdominal radiography increased the index of suspicion of intussusception in 48% of cases (sensitivity) and 21% of controls; however, in 11% of cases, the abdominal x-rays were incorrectly interpreted as being reassuring. The specificity was 21%. The radiographs were deemed equivocal for 41% of cases and 58% of controls.

Conclusions

Abdominal x-rays have a low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing intussusception when interpreted by pediatric emergency physicians.

a Pediatrics Residency Program, Department of Pediatrics; CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

b Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics; CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

 Supported by a grant from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

PII: S0022-3476(09)00368-0

doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.006


View previous. 34 of 54 View next.

Advertisement