The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 155, Issue 1 , Pages 7-9 , July 2009

Current Challenges and Future Research in Measuring Preferences for Pediatric Health Outcomes

  • Lisa A. Prosser, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Lisa A. Prosser, PhD, Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System, 300 North Ingalls, Bldg 6E14, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109.

References 

  1. Prosser LA, Hammitt JK, Keren R. Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations. PharmacoEconomics. 2007;25:713–726
  2. Petrou S. Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Econ. 2003;12:697–702
  3. Petrou S, Gray R. Methodological challenges posed by economic evaluations of early childhood intervention programmes. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2005;4:175–181
  4. Petrou S, Henderson J. Preference-based approaches to measuring the benefits of perinatal care. Birth. 2003;30:217–226
  5. Carroll AE, Downs SM. Improving decision analyses: parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes. J Pediatr. 2009;155:21–25
  6. In:  Gold MR,  Siegel JE,  Russell LB,  Weinstein MC editor. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996;
  7. Griebsch I, Coast J, Brown J. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e600–e608
  8. Ladapo JA, Neumann PJ, Keren R, Prosser LA. Valuing children's health: a comparison of cost-utility analyses for adult and paediatric health interventions in the US. PharmacoEconomics. 2007;25:817–828
  9. Ungar WJ, Santos MT. The pediatric quality appraisal questionnaire: an instrument for evaluation of the pediatric health economics literature. Value Health. 2004;6:522–531
  10. Dolan P. Output measures and valuation in health. In:  Drummond MF,  McGuire A editor. Economic evaluation in health care. New York: Oxford; 2001;p. 46–67
  11. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW. Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics. 1995;7:490–502
  12. Hennessy S, Kind P. Measuring health status in children: developing and testing a child-friendly version of EQ-5D. In: Scientific proceedings of the EuroQol Group.York. United Kingdom: EuroQol Group. 2002;291–310
  13. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Griffith LE, Ferrie PJ. Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: comparison of measurement properties. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2285–2294
  14. Saigal S, Stoskopf BL, Feeny D, Furlong D, Burrows E, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes amoung health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. JAMA. 1999;281:1991–1997
  15. Keren R, Pati S, Feudtner C. The generation gap: differences between children and adults pertinent to economic evaluations of health interventions. PharmacoEconomics. 2004;22:71–81

PII: S0022-3476(09)00220-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.03.007

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 155, Issue 1 , Pages 7-9 , July 2009