The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 154, Issue 5 , Pages 759-763 , May 2009

The Public Health Risks of Media Violence: A Meta-Analytic Review

  • Christopher J. Ferguson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Christopher J. Ferguson, Department of Behavioral, Applied Sciences & Criminal Justice, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX 78045
  • ,
  • John Kilburn, PhD

Received 25 June 2008 ,Revised 29 October 2008 ,Accepted 17 November 2008.

References 

  1. Huesmann LR. The impact of electronic media violence: Scientific theory and research. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:S6–S13
  2. Bushman B, Anderson CA. Media violence and the American public. Am Psychol. 2001;56:477–489
  3. Block J, Crain B. Omissions and errors in “Media violence and the American public.”. Am Psychol. 2007;62:252–253
  4. Savage J. Does viewing violent media really cause criminal violence? (A methodological review). Aggress Viol Behav. 2004;10:99–128
  5. Olson C. Media violence research and youth violence data: why do they conflict?. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28:144–150
  6. Guantlett D. Moving experiences: media effects and beyond. Luton: John Libbey; 2005;
  7. Freedman J. Media violence and its effect on aggression: assessing the scientific evidence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2002;
  8. Paik H, Comstock G. The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis. Commun Res. 1994;21:516–539
  9. Bushman B, Huesmann LR. Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:348–352
  10. Sherry J. The effects of violent video games on aggression: a meta-analysis. Hum Commun Res. 2001;27:409–431
  11. Ferguson CJ. Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: a meta-analytic review. Aggressive Violent Behav. 2007;12:470–482
  12. Hogben M. Factors moderating the effect of television aggression on viewer behavior. Commun Res. 1998;25:220–247
  13. Savage J, Yancey C. The effects of media violence exposure on criminal aggression: a meta-analysis. Criminal Justice Behav. 2008;35:772–791
  14. Ferguson CJ, Smith S, Miller-Stratton H, Fritz S, Heinrich E. Aggression in the laboratory: problems with the validity of the modified Taylor Competitive Reaction Time Test as a measure of aggression in media violence studies. J Aggressive Maltreatment Trauma. 2008;118:32
  15. Smith G, Egger M. Meta-analysis: unresolved issues and future developments. Br Med J. 1998;316:http://www.bmj.com/archive/7126/7126ed8.htmAccessed Jun 24, 2008
  16. Cook D, Guyatt G, Ryan G, Clifton J, Buckingham L, Willan A, et al. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? (Current convictions and controversies). JAMA. 1993;269:2749–2753
  17. Hunter J, Schmidt F. Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004;
  18. Henry D Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. Associations between peer nominations, teacher ratings, self-reports, and observations of malicious and disruptive behavior. Assessment. 2006;13:241–252
  19. Cohen J. The Earth is round (P < .05). Am Psychol. 1994;49:997–1003
  20. Ferguson CJ. Violent crime: clinical and social implications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008;In press
  21. Rosnow R, Rosenthal R. Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. Can J Exp Psychol. 2003;57:221–237
  22. McGraw K. Problems with the BESD: a comment on Rosenthal's “How are we doing in soft psychology?”. Am Psychol. 1991;46:1084–1086
  23. Strahan R. Remarks on the binomial effect size display. Am Psychol. 1991;46:1083–1084
  24. American Cancer Society. Smoking and cancer mortality table. American Cancer Society web-site http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_10_2X_Smoking_and_Cancer_Mortality_Table.aspAccessed Jan 28, 2008
  25. Ritter D, Eslea M. Hot sauce, toy guns and graffiti: a critical account of current laboratory aggression paradigms. Aggressive Behav. 2005;31:407–419
  26. Grimes T, Anderson J, Bergen L. Media violence and aggression: acience and ideology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008;

 The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

PII: S0022-3476(08)01037-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.11.033

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 154, Issue 5 , Pages 759-763 , May 2009