The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 153, Issue 4 , Pages 478-483, October 2008

The Value of Routine Blood Pressure Measurement in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department with Nonurgent Problems

  • Jessica N. Stewart, MD, FRCP(C)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dr. J. N. Stewart, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, 2300 Tupper St, H3H 1P3, Room T-133, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • David McGillivray, MD, FRCP(C)

      Affiliations

    • Division of Emergency Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • John Sussman

      Affiliations

    • Division of Emergency Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Bethany Foster, MD, MSCE

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Received 22 November 2007; received in revised form 25 February 2008; accepted 31 March 2008. published online 27 May 2008.

Objective

Blood pressure (BP) is measured at triage in most emergency departments (EDs). We aimed to determine the value of triage BP in diagnosing hypotension and true hypertension in children age ≥3 years presenting with nonurgent problems.

Study design

In this prospective study, eligible children underwent automated BP measurement at triage. If BP was elevated, then the measurement was repeated manually. Children with a high manual BP were followed. True hypertension was defined as a manual BP >95th percentile for sex, age, and height measured on 3 occasions.

Results

Automated triage BP was measured in 549 children (53.4% male; mean age, 9.4 ± 4.3 years) and was found to be elevated in 144 of them (26%). No child was hypotensive. Among the 495 patients with complete follow-up, the specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of elevated triage BP in diagnosing true hypertension were 81.8% and 0%, respectively. A sensitivity analysis including those with incomplete follow-up, in which the population prevalence of true hypertension was assumed to be 1% to 2%, resulted in a specificity of 74.5% to 75.3% and a PPV of 3.8% to 7.5%.

Conclusions

The yield of measuring BP at triage in children with nonurgent problems appears to be extremely low.

Abbreviations: BP, Blood pressure, CI, Confidence interval, CTAS, Canadian Triage Acuity Scale, ED, Emergency department, NHBPEP, National High Blood Pressure Education Program, PPV, Positive predictive value

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

PII: S0022-3476(08)00271-0

doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.03.046

Refers to article:

  • Blood Pressure Screening in Children: Do We Have This Right?

    Aaron Friedman
    The Journal of Pediatrics October 2008 (Vol. 153, Issue 4, Pages 452-453)

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 153, Issue 4 , Pages 478-483, October 2008