Prospective Validation of the Pediatric Appendicitis Score
Received 15 October 2005; received in revised form 5 October 2007; accepted 24 January 2008. published online 20 March 2008.
Objective
To prospectively validate the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), developed on a cohort of children with abdominal pain suggestive of appendicitis, in unselected children with abdominal pain who present to the emergency department.
Study design
Over a 19-month period, we prospectively recruited children 1 to 17 years old who came to our tertiary pediatric emergency department, with a chief complaint of abdominal pain of duration less than 7 days. PAS components included fever >38° C, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, cough/percussion/hopping tenderness (2 points), right-lower-quadrant tenderness (2 points), migration of pain, leukocytosis >10 000 cells/mm3, and polymorphonuclear neutrophilia > 7500 cells/mm3. A follow-up call was made to verify final outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver operating characteristic curve of the PAS with respect to diagnosis of appendicitis were calculated.
Results
We collected data on 849 children. 123 (14.5%) had pathologic study–proven appendicitis. Mean (median, range) score for children with appendicitis and without appendicitis was 7.0 (7, 2-10) and 1.9 (1, 0-9), respectively. If a cutoff PAS of ≤2 was used to discharge patients without further investigation, only 3 (2.4%) with appendicitis would be sent home. If a PAS of ≥7 was used to take children to the operating room without further investigation, only 29 (4%) would not have appendicitis. For the PAS the area under the receiver operator curve was 0.95.
Conclusions
The PAS is useful, because a value ≤2 (found in 73% of children without appendicitis) has high validity for ruling out appendicitis, and a score ≥7 (found in 61% of children with appendicitis) has a high validity for predicting the presence of appendicitis. Children with PAS of 3 to 6 (37% with appendicitis and 23% without appendicitis in this study) should undergo further investigation such as observation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography.
aPediatric Research in Emergency Therapeutics (PRETx) Program, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, and Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
bDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
cPopulation Health Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
dDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Reprint requests: Ran D. Goldman, MD, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, 4480 Oak St, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada.
ABSTRACT