The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 151, Issue 2 , Pages 121-126.e1, August 2007

Healthcare Use and Costs of Medium-chain Acyl-Coa Dehydrogenase Deficiency in Australia: Screening Versus No Screening

  • Marion Haas, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Associate Professor Marion Haas, CHERE, UTS. PO Box 123, Broadway NSW 2007.
  • ,
  • Meredyth Chaplin, BAppSc

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Pamela Joy, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Veronica Wiley, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Carly Black, Bpsych

      Affiliations

    • Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Bridget Wilcken, MBChB

      Affiliations

    • Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
    • University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Received 29 August 2006; received in revised form 30 January 2007; accepted 5 March 2007. published online 16 June 2007.

Objective

To describe and analyze the use and costs of hospital services for children diagnosed with medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency either with newborn screening or clinical diagnosis in Australia between 1994 and 2002. MCAD deficiency is a potentially lethal disorder of fatty-acid oxidation.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective audit of medical records supplemented by a parental survey.

Results

A total of 59 children with MCAD deficiency were identified, 24 by using newborn screening. In the first 4 years of life, screening children cost an average of $A1676 (US$1297) per year for inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient visits, compared with $A1796 (US$1390) for children in whom a clinical diagnosis was made. Forty-two percent of the children who underwent screening were admitted to the hospital, compared with 71% of children who did not undergo screening. Children who did not undergo screening used significantly more inpatient services and cost significantly more in emergency services. There were also some significant differences in use on a year-by-year basis.

Conclusions

Children who do not undergo screening may be more likely to be admitted to the hospital and to incur higher emergency department costs than children who underwent screening, and children seem more likely to attend hospital outpatient clinics. Screening does not result in higher costs from a hospital perspective.

Abbreviations: ED, Emergency department, LOS, Length of stay, MCAD, Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, MS/MS, Tandem mass spectrometry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a project grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (249406).

PII: S0022-3476(07)00246-6

doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.03.011

Refers to article:

  • Newborn Screening: The Spigot is Open and Threatens to Become a Flood

    Stephen Cederbaum
    The Journal of Pediatrics August 2007 (Vol. 151, Issue 2, Pages 108-110)

  • Cost-Effectiveness of Neonatal Screening for Medium Chain acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency: The Homogeneous Population of the Netherlands

    Christian S. van der Hilst, Terry G.J. Derks, Dirk-Jan Reijngoud, G. Peter A. Smit, Elisabeth M. TenVergert
    The Journal of Pediatrics August 2007 (Vol. 151, Issue 2, Pages 115-120.e3)

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 151, Issue 2 , Pages 121-126.e1, August 2007