The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 150, Issue 6 , Pages 579-582 , June 2007

A Standard for Assessing the Risks of Pediatric Research: Pro and Con

  • David Wendler (Pro)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: David Wendler, Department of Clinical Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    • ,
  • Leonard Glantz (Con)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Law, Bioethics, and Human Rights, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Received 10 September 2006 ,Revised 1 December 2006 ,Accepted 1 February 2007.

References 

  1. Institute of Medicine. Ethical Conduct of Clinical Research Involving Children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004;chap 2. Available at http://www.nap.edu
  2. Nicholson RH. In: Medical Research with Children: Ethics, Law, and Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1986;p. 40–60
  3. US Food and Drug Administration. The pediatric exclusivity provision. Status report to Congress, January 2001. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/pediatric.
  4. Koocker GP, Keith-Spiegel P. Scientific issues in psychosocial research and education with children. In:  Grodin MA,  Glantz LH editor. Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics and Law. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994;
  5. Brock DW. Ethical issues in exposing children to risks in research. In:  Grodin MA,  Glantz LH editor. Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics and Law. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994;p. 81–101
  6. Ackerman TF. Nontherapeutic research procedures involving children with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol. 1994;11:134–136
  7. McCormick RA. Proxy consent in the experimental situation. Perspect Biol Med. 1974;18:2–20
  8. McCormick RA. Experimentation in children: sharing in sociality. Hastings Cent Rep. 1976;6:41–46
  9. Ramsey P. The enforcement of morals: nontherapeutic research on children (A reply to Richard McCormick). Hastings Cent Rep. 1976;6:21–30
  10. Ramsey P. Children as research subjects: a reply. Hastings Cent Rep. 1977;7:40–42
  11. Council of Europe. Additional protocol on the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning biomedical research. Available at http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/195.htm. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  12. Medical Research Council of the UK. Medical research with children. Available at http://www.mrc.ac.uk/pdf-ethics_guide_children.pdf#xml=http://www.mrc.ac.uk/scripts/texis.exe/webinator/search/xml.txt?query=risks+in+children&pr=mrcall&order=r&cq=&id=44b886ec2. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  13. National Council for Science and Technology. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of biomedical research involving human subjects in Kenya. 2004;Nairobi, Kenya
  14. Indian Council on Medical Research, Ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human subjects, 2000. Available at http://icmr.nic.in/ethical.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  15. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 1987;236:280–285
  16. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgments under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–1131
  17. Weinstein N. Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science. 1989;246:1232–1233
  18. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research. Geneva, Switzerland: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; 2002;Commentary on guideline 13
  19. Kopelman LM. Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research. J Med Philos. 2004;29:351–378
  20. Resnik DB. Eliminating the daily risks standard from the definition of minimal risk. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:35–38
  21. Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. Available at http://brightfutures.aap.org/web/healthCareProfessionalstoolsAndResources.asp. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  22. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/international/ HSPCompilation.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  23. Nepal Health Research Council. Guidelines for institutional review committees for health research in Nepal. 2005;Kathmandu, Nepal
  24. US Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations. 45 CFR 46.116.
  25. US Food And Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, 50.25. Vol 1, revised April 1, 2005.
  26. Wendler D, Belsky L, Thompson KM, Emanuel EJ. Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit. JAMA. 2005;294:826–832
  27. Available at http://www.ysa.org/program/program.cfm. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  28. Available at http://www.gysd.net/home/index.html. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  29. Available at http://www.unicefusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=hkIXLdMRJtE&b=1706865. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  30. Available at http://www.habitat.org/youthprograms/suppdocs/2005_summary_report_pdf.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2007.
  31. Fried C. Children as subjects for medical experimentation. In:  van Eys J editors. Research on Children. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1978;p. 107–114
  32. In re Richardson, 284 So 2d 185 (La App 1973).
  33. Available at http://www.redcross.org/services/biomed/0,1082,0557,00.html. Accessed March 16, 2007.

 The opinions expressed herein are the authors’ own. They do not represent any position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, or Department of Health and Human Services.

PII: S0022-3476(07)00148-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.018

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 150, Issue 6 , Pages 579-582 , June 2007

Article Tools