The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 150, Issue 3 , Pages 268-273, March 2007

The Contribution of the DLG5 113A Variant in Early-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease

  • R.K. Russell, MRCPCH

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dr R. K. Russell, MRCPCH, Gastrointestinal Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU.
  • ,
  • H.E. Drummond, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • E.R. Nimmo, BSc, MSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • N. Anderson, BSc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • D.C. Wilson, MD, FRCPCH

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • P.M. Gillett, MBChB, FRCPCH

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • P. McGrogan, MBChB, MRCP

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • K. Hassan, MBBS, FRCPCH

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • L.T. Weaver, MD, FRCPCH

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • W.M. Bisset, MD, FRCPCH

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • G. Mahdi, FRCPCH

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • J. Satsangi, DPhil, FRCP

      Affiliations

    • Gastrointestinal Unit, Molecular Medicine Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Public Health Sciences, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Yorkhill Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Received 14 July 2006; received in revised form 4 October 2006; accepted 7 December 2006.

Article Outline

Objective

To assess the contribution of the 113 G→A missense mutation within the discs, large homolog 5 (DLG5) gene in childhood-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Scotland.

Study design

Two-hundred and ninety-six children with IBD were studied. Parental DNA was also collected for transmission disequilibrium testing (TDT) analysis. Genotyping was performed by TaqMan®. Genotype-phenotype analysis was also undertaken. Socioeconomic status was assigned using a deprivation category (DepCat) score 1 through 7 (1 = most affluent).

Results

TDT analysis demonstrated a significant association with IBD (P = .045). On unifactorial analysis, 113A carriage was associated with: (1) higher social class (DepCat 1 compared with 2-7, and 1-2 compared with 3-7) (66.7% vs 22.6%, P = .0005, OR 6.84 [1.99-23.55] and 37.2% vs 22.2%, P = .03, OR 2.08 [1.04-4.17], respectively); (2) higher height centile (>75th centile vs <75th centile) (42.9% vs 23.1%, P = .01, OR 2.50 [1.18-5.28]); and (3) male sex in Crohn’s disease (CD) (29.3% vs 16.9%, P = .04, OR 2.04 [1.01-4.11]). Multifactorial analysis demonstrated that higher social class (DepCat 1) was independently associated with carriage of variants of 113A (P = .001, OR=6.92 [2.24-21.33]).

Conclusions

DLG5 113A is associated with increased susceptibility to IBD in Scottish children. The effect may be most marked for those children living in relative affluence.

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index, CD, Crohn’s disease, DepCat, Deprivation category, DLG5, Discs, large homolog 5, IBD, Inflammatory bowel disease, UC, Ulcerative colitis, TDT, Transmission disequilibrium testing

 

A strong genetic basis for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been suggested by evidence from twin studies, and family studies,1 and has been supported by the identification of several genes associated with increased susceptibility to IBD: CARD15,2, 3 DLG5,4 SLC22A4/5,5 MDR1,6 and CARD4.7 The disease model that has evolved is that ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are related polygenic diseases sharing some but not all susceptibility genes.8

We have demonstrated a rising incidence of childhood-onset IBD in Scotland9, 10 and within the Scottish population we have demonstrated association between susceptibility to early-onset CD both with northern latitudes and with relative affluence.11 In a study of 580 incident IBD cases over the period 1981 to 1995, the relative risk of developing IBD and CD was significantly increased in areas of relative affluence, compared with areas of socioeconomic deprivation (P = .02 and P = .03, respectively).

Over the last decade, genome-wide scanning in IBD has been remarkably successful, leading to the identification of several susceptibility loci, satisfying rigorous criteria for definite linkage.12 We have shown that IBD1 and IBD5 both contain determinants of susceptibility and disease severity in early-onset IBD in Scotland, but these loci alone do not account for the majority of the genetic risk in our population.13, 14

A European genome-wide scan in 353 IBD sibling pairs (including UK patients) identified an area on chromosome 10 that achieved criteria for “suggestive linkage” in patients with CD.12, 15 Fine mapping of this region identified variants of the discs, large homolog 5 (Drosophila) (DLG5) gene situated within this locus that may be associated with increased susceptibility to IBD.4 The 113 G→A variant (a missense mutation in exon 30) encoding for the amino acid substitution R30Q was associated with susceptibility to IBD and CD.4 Further studies have yielded inconsistent results.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 Thus the effect appears inconsistent, relatively weak, and population-specific. We have rigorously assessed the contribution of the DLG5 113G/A mutation with respect to IBD susceptibility and phenotype in the high incidence Scottish population.

Back to Article Outline

Methods 

Patients diagnosed with IBD younger than 16 years of age were studied (197 CD, 73 UC, and 26 indeterminate colitis [IC]). There were 161 males and 135 females (Table I). These persons were recruited from pediatric gastroenterology centers across Scotland and from the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh. Parental DNA was also collected where available to allow transmission disequilibrium testing (TDT) to be performed (DNA from both parents was available in 69% of cases).

Table I. Demographics of inflammatory bowel disease patients at diagnosis
Sex (M/F)161/135
Median age at diagnosis (y)11.00(IQR8.42-12.92)
Current smoker7/295(2.4%)
Family history of IBD98/292(33.5%)
Caucasian (%)288(97.3%)
Extraintestinal manifestations
Joint23/282(8.2%)
Erythema nodosum26/282(9.2%)
Location according to the Vienna classification25
Terminal ileum (L1)9(4.6%)
Colon (L2)48(24.3%)
Ileocolonic (L3)38(19.3%)
Upper gastrointestinal (L4)93(47.2%)
None9(4.6%)
Behavior according to the Vienna classification25
Inflammatory (B1)163(82.7%)
Stricturing (B2)7(3.6%)
Penetrating (B3)27(13.7%)
Ulcerative colitis disease extent
Extensive colitis⁎⁎52(71.2%)
Anthropometric centiles
Weight (75-91st)22/288(7.6%)
Height (75-91st)28/272(11.1%)
BMI (75-91st)27/270(10.0%)

The phenotypic data at diagnosis represent 296 patients with IBD (including 197 CD and 73 UC) unless otherwise stated.

These patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria for Crohn’s disease, but their disease location that did not fit into the Vienna classification.

Based on centile plotted on UK Growth Chart © Child Growth Foundation 1996.

⁎⁎Inflammation proximal to the splenic flexure.

Disease Phenotyping and Data Collection 

The diagnosis of IBD was based on standard criteria.24 Comprehensive clinical phenotypic data were obtained using retrospective case note review and personal interview. The complete set of phenotypic variables collected in this cohort has been described previously and includes growth measurements and socioeconomic data assessing relative affluence/deprivation.13 The anthropometric information collected was weight and height of patients with a body mass index (BMI) calculated thereafter. The data were plotted on a standard UK centile chart of the UK 1990 population data (© Child Growth Foundation 1996) and an appropriate centile band was allocated. The Vienna classification together with a more extensive phenotypic description for each patient were used to describe the phenotype of patients with CD.13, 25

Deprivation Status 

Socioeconomic status of the patient’s postcode was allocated using the Carstairs score. This score is a measure of socioeconomic deprivation derived from levels of male unemployment, head of the household’s social class, the level of overcrowding in households, and car ownership generated from census data.26 Data used to calculate the scores for this study were based on the UK 2001 census data (www.groscotland.gov.uk/grosweb/grosweb.nsf/pages/censushm). The Carstairs score was then assigned a numerical deprivation category (DepCat score) based on the postcode (scored 1-7; 1 = no deprivation and 7 = maximum deprivation). The data for the DepCat score were not calculated by us as part of this study; we simply matched the DepCat scores with the patient postcode (the DepCat scores and matching postcodes were obtained from the Edinburgh University data library). In cases where a patient’s postcode fell between two different DepCat categories, no score was allocated. Thus, this score is derived from a person’s postcode and reflects the socioeconomic status of the area in which a patient lives rather than an individual case-specific score. The Carstairs score has been widely used to study the association between socioeconomic conditions and disease.

The methodology used to define North and South Scotland was based on patients’ postcodes.11 Written informed consent from all patients and controls was obtained. All relevant Research Ethics Committees approved the study protocol.

Genotyping 

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral venous blood in all patients by a modified salting-out technique,27 and it was re-suspended in 1xTE (10 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) at a final concentration of 100 ng/μL. The SNP 113G/A (rs1248696) was typed using the TaqMan® system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Western General Hospital in January 2005 by personnel blinded to the project aims. The genotyping methods used for the three CARD15 mutations (Gly908Arg, Arg702Trp, and Leu1007fsinsC) have been described previously.28

Statistical Analysis 

TDT was performed in IBD trios using TRANSMIT.28 This method makes full use of the data available using inferred genotypes if data from both parents are not available. The PedCheck software program (Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) was used to exclude any potential cases of nonpaternity or genotyping error.29 Genotype-phenotype associations were analyzed by χ2 test, or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate, using the Minitab statistical software package (Minitab Ltd., Coventry, UK). To identify significant independent variables associated with genotype, unifactorial and multifactorial logistic regression analyses were carried out.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

Transmission Disequilibrium Testing Analysis 

In total, 97% of samples were successfully genotyped. TDT analysis based on 270 families demonstrated an association of allelic variants of the 113A allele with IBD only (χ2 = 4.01, P = .045) (Table II).

Table II. Transmission disequilibrium testing results for the DLG5-113 mutant allele
ObservedExpectedVariance (O-E)χ2 valueP value
IBD6858.54322.2724.01.045
CD4842.45315.9911.92.178
UC2016.096.44092.37.105

The result of transmission disequilibrium testing for the 113 G→A in 270 families demonstrates association with IBD but not Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis.

Association with Affluence 

A higher rate of carriage of the 113A variant was present in the patients with DepCat score 1 (n = 12) compared with those with DepCat score 2 through 7 (n = 252) (66.7% vs 22.6%, P = .0005, OR 6.84 [1.99-23.55]) and in comparing allele frequency between the two groups (33.3% vs 13.3%, P = .006, OR = 3.26 [1.34-7.92]) (Table III). Higher carriage of 113A variants was also demonstrated if patients with DepCat scores 1 and 2 were analysed together (n = 43) and compared with patients with DepCat scores 3 through 7 (n = 221) (37.2% vs 22.2%, P = .03, OR 2.08 [1.04-4.17], respectively). There was no significant difference between northern (n = 35) and southern latitudes (n = 259) in carriage of variant 113A alleles (34.4% vs 23.9%, P = .20, respectively).

Table III. DepCat scores in patients with IBD together with DLG5 113A carriage rates
DepCat scoreNumber of patientsDLG carriage
11266.7%
23125.8%
35612.5%
47223.6%
54533.3%
62718.5%
72123.8%
Unclassified3228.1%

There is a significant difference in DLG 113A variant carriage in patients in DepCat score 1 v. 2-7 as well as 1 and 2 combined compared with scores 3-7 (P = .001, OR = 6.92 [2.24-21.33], and P = .02, OR = 2.49 [1.13-5.47], respectively). All patients in DepCat 1 were Caucasian (7 males and 5 females).

A validated scoring system of deprivation based on data from the 2001 UK census (1 = no deprivation, 7 = maximum deprivation). The deprivation score is a measure of socioeconomic deprivation derived from demographic factors that relate to a person’s postcode.26

Multifactorial Analysis 

Binary logistic regression analysis combining family history of IBD, sex, weight, height, BMI centile (as either 75th-91st or other), and social class (as either DepCat score 1 or 2-7) together with joint disease in all patients with IBD was performed.

Carriage of the 113A variant was associated with DepCat score 1 taking into account all of the above factors (P = .001, OR = 6.92 [2.24-21.33]). If the same model was run combining DepCat 1 and 2 together compared with 3 through 7 and with all other factors, the association between higher socioeconomic class and 113A carriage was confirmed (P = .02, OR = 2.49 [1.13-5.47]).

Genotype-Phenotype Analysis: Unifactorial Analysis 

Growth centiles 

On unifactorial analysis, carriage of the 113A allele was associated with the higher height centiles (>75th centile vs <75th centile) (42.9% vs 23.1%, P = .01 OR 2.50 [1.18-5.28]) at disease diagnosis. Carriage of variants was highest in the 75th through 91st centile for weight and height at diagnosis compared with those in the nine other centile bands (56.2% vs 23.4%, P = .004, OR 4.20 [1.49-11.81] and 48.0% vs 22.4%, P = .006 OR 3.19 [1.36-7.47], respectively).

Sex 

In CD, the carriage rate of 113A variant alleles was higher in males than in females (29.3% vs 16.9%, P = .04, OR 2.04 [1.01-4.11]). Allele frequency showed a similar trend (male 15.1% vs female 9.0%, P = .07, OR 1.79 [0.94-3.40]), but this difference was not statistically significant. There was no sex-related difference between allele frequency and carriage rates of 113A variants in patients with UC or IBD.

Extra-intestinal manifestations 

The carriage of 113A variant alleles was uncommon in patients with joint disease or symptoms but did not reach statistical significance (13.0% vs 25.9%, P = .21, OR 0.42 [0.12-1.49], respectively).

Age at diagnosis 

There was no difference in the median ages at diagnosis of carriers of 113A variant alleles versus noncarriers for patients with CD at 11.4 years versus 11.2 years (P = .91) and with IBD at 11.3 years versus 10.9 years (P = .73).

Disease Location and Behavior 

There was no difference in allele frequency or carriage rates of this 113A DLG5 variant in disease location or behavior in patients with either CD or UC at diagnosis.

DLG5-CARD15 interaction 

There was no difference in carriage of the DLG5 113A variant when patients were stratified based on carriage of at least one of the three common CARD15 variants (Gly908Arg, Arg702Trp, and Leu1007fsinsC). The carriage of CARD15 variant alleles compared with noncarriage in patients with IBD or CD was 14.0% versus 20.5% (P = .30, OR 0.63 [0.26-1.53]) and 14.7% versus 20.5% (P = .43, OR 0.66 [0.23-1.88]), respectively.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

Our data suggest that the penetrance of the DLG5 genetic variants, and thus genetic associations with disease, may be influenced by environmental factors present in affluent families in Scotland. Thus although the overall association of the DLG5 113 variant alleles with early-onset IBD in the Scottish population appears modest, the association with children living in affluence is strong. These findings suggest a potentially novel insight into gene-environmental interactions in IBD.

We have previously demonstrated an association between higher social class (DepCat 1) and early-onset IBD in Scotland by Poisson regression analysis in a study of 580 patients with IBD; these data clearly demonstrated that the relative risk of IBD and CD is highest in the most affluent families.11 The association of CD with affluence has also been demonstrated in other childhood IBD populations.30 Our findings complement previous UK data, suggesting that the presence of a hot water tap and a separate bathroom increase the risk of developing CD.31, 32 The reason for these associations with affluence and household hygiene remain unclear, but the role of water quality,32 diet (cold-chain hypothesis), hygiene, and infection rates33 are potentially plausible.

We now present evidence suggesting that the most susceptible persons within these affluent regions may also possess a risk genotype, supporting a gene-environment interaction as an explanation for the association with affluence. The association with the most affluent appears robust in the present study—the relationship is present when DLG5 113A carriage rate is compared between patients with DepCat score 1 and DepCat 2 through 7 moreover, the association holds on multifactorial analysis notwithstanding the small number of patients in DepCat 1.

The potential mechanisms whereby DepCat 1 children should differ from children with other DepCat scores and how this influences the development of IBD remain uncertain and a matter for investigation, but it is interesting to note some of the differences highlighted from published studies. Children from lower DepCat scores have higher rates of dental caries, are more likely to be colonized with yeasts, and have higher rates of Helicobacter pylori infection.34, 35 Breast-feeding incidence and duration are highest in DepCat 1 and 2 together in one study,36 and they are higher in DepCat 1 compared with 2 and other categories in a second study.37 These data highlight the fact that the early exposure to microbes in each DepCat category is likely to be different and present a possible mechanism of how DepCat score, environment, and genotype interact.

Growth and development are critical aspects of childhood-onset IBD. Growth failure is a severe manifestation of CD that we have recently shown to be strongly linked to carriage of disease associated variants from within the IBD5 locus.14 However, in the present study the association of DLG5 variants is with higher height and weight centiles leading to the hypothesis that this variant may act in the opposite manner to IBD5 variants and confers a protective effect against growth failure. A similar protective role has been previously suggested for the –238 tumor necrosis factor-α variant in a pediatric CD population.38 These data therefore also provide indirect support for the concept that this growth variant leads to disease expression in children lacking socioeconomic deprivation.

The 113A variant was commoner in male compared with female children with CD in our study. It has been previously reported that the DLG5 variants are more common in males.39 It is entirely plausible that DLG5 studies in early-onset populations are more likely to give positive results because of the male predominance in childhood-onset CD (contrasting with the female predominance in adult populations).40, 41

What then of the overall contribution of this DLG5 variant to disease susceptibility? Our TDT analysis (P = .045) reveals data similar to those of Stoll et al and subsequent publications, which have suggested a weak overall association of variant alleles of DLG5 113A with IBD.4, 19 In Stoll’s original study, initial TDT analysis in 457 IBD trios (302 CD) demonstrated association with IBD (P = .004) and CD (P = .04),4 but a replication cohort of 485 IBD trios only suggested a trend toward significance for IBD and CD (P = .09 and P = .07, respectively). Daly et al reported TDT data in two further IBD populations, one demonstrating significant association (P = .02) but the second showing no association.19 In the Flemish population, contrasting results to those of Stoll and colleagues are reported with significant undertransmission of 113A variants.17

Case-control studies have yielded inconsistent results,4, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 with heterogeneity among controls more than cases providing the differences between study populations.16, 42 This heterogeneity between different study populations matches data in the Scottish population for CARD15 and TLR4.13, 43, 44

Our positive TDT results and the conflicting data from other series are nonetheless consistent with the hypothesis that DLG5 may represent a gene of relatively modest effect in IBD.16 The population differences can be explained by a combination of factors—heterogeneity between geographically/ethnically distinct populations and, heterogeneity within subgroups of IBD patients with specific differences in the sex and age of patients. It is interesting to note that in our own Scottish population using TDT analysis, a method that protects against the problems of population stratification, we have shown a positive association when a case-control study in a Scottish adult population has been negative.22 An adequately powered case-control study to prove beyond doubt a definite role for DLG5 variants in IBD etiology may necessitate studies of greater size than any yet carried out in CD or UC, requiring several thousand patients and controls.16, 19 This strategy is similar to that applied to many other polygenic diseases, in which genetic determinants of low genotype relative risk have been identified.45

In summary, we provide preliminary evidence that suggests that a novel environmental modifier, affluence, may affect gene penetrance and disease expression in early-onset IBD. We suggest deprivation status represents a potentially important confounding variable that needs to be investigated in studies of the genetics of IBD and perhaps other common immune-mediated illnesses.

Back to Article Outline

 

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of all patients and parents who participated in the study together with the specialist nurses, dieticians, and secretaries in each of the teaching hospitals as well as the pediatricians, practice nurses, and GPs throughout Scotland whose support for the study was invaluable. We thank Robin Rice in the University of Edinburgh data library for supplying the DepCat data and matching postcodes. We would also like to thank the staff at the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility Edinburgh.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Russell RK, Satsangi J. IBD: a family affair. Best Practice Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;18:525–539
  2. Hugot JP, Chamaillard M, Zouali H, Lesage S, Cezard JP, Belaiche J, et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature. 2001;411:599–603
  3. Ogura Y, Bonen DK, Inohara N, Nicolae DL, Chen FF, Ramos R, et al. A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature. 2001;411:603–606
  4. Stoll M, Corneliussen B, Costello CM, Waetzig GH, Mellgard B, Koch WA, et al. Genetic variation in DLG5 is associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Genet. 2004;36:476–480
  5. Peltekova VD, Wintle RF, Rubin LA, Amos CI, Huang Q, Gu X, et al. Functional variants of OCTN cation transporter genes are associated with Crohn disease. Nature Genet. 2004;36:471–475
  6. Brant SR, Panhuysen CI, Nicolae D, Reddy DM, Bonen DK, Karaliukas R, et al. MDR1 Ala893 polymorphism is associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:1282–1292
  7. McGovern DPB, Hysi P, Ahmad T, van Heel DA, Moffatt MF, Carey A, et al. Association between a complex insertion/deletion polymorphism in NOD1(CARD4) and susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:1245–1250
  8. Ahmad T, Satsangi J, McGovern D, Bunce M, Jewell DP. Review article: the genetics of inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:731–748
  9. Armitage E, Drummond H, Ghosh S, Ferguson A. Incidence of juvenile-onset Crohn’s disease in Scotland. Lancet. 1999;353:1496–1497
  10. Armitage E, Drummond HE, Wilson DC, Ghosh S. Increasing incidence of both juvenile-onset Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis in Scotland. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13:1439–1447
  11. Armitage EL, Aldhous MC, Anderson N, Drummond HE, Riemersma RA, Ghosh S, et al. Incidence of juvenile-onset Crohn’s disease in Scotland: association with northern latitude and affluence. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1051–1057
  12. Lander E, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nature Genet. 1995;11:241–247
  13. Russell RK, Drummond HE, Nimmo ER, Anderson N, Smith L, Wilson DC, et al. Genotype-phenotype analysis in childhood-onset Crohn’s disease: NOD2/CARD15 variants consistently predict phenotypic characteristics of severe disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:955–964
  14. Russell RK, Drummond HE, Nimmo ER, Anderson NH, Noble CL, Wilson DC, et al. Analysis of the influence of OCTN1/2 variants within the IBD5 locus on disease susceptibility and growth indices in early onset inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2006;55:1114–1123
  15. Hampe J, Schreiber S, Shaw SH, Lau KF, Bridger S, Macpherson AJ, et al. A genomewide analysis provides evidence for novel linkages in inflammatory bowel disease in a large European cohort. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:808–816
  16. Friedrichs F, Stoll M. Role of discs large homolog 5. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3651–3656
  17. Vermeire S, Pierik M, Hlavaty T, Claessens G, van Schuerbeeck N, Joossens S, et al. Association of organic cation transporter risk haplotype with perianal penetrating Crohn’s disease but not with susceptibility to IBD. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1845–1853
  18. Buning C, Geerdts L, Fiedler T, Gentz E, Pitre G, Reuter W, et al. DLG5 variants in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:786–792
  19. Daly MJ, Pearce AV, Farwell L, Fisher SA, Latiano A, Prescott NJ, et al. Association of DLG5 R30Q variant with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:835–839
  20. Gazouli M, Mantzaris G, Archimandritis AJ, Nasioulas G, Anagnou NP. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of OCTN1, OCTN2, and DLG5 genes in Greek patients with Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:7525–7530
  21. Tremelling M, Waller S, Bredin F, Greenfield S, Parkes M. Genetic variants in TNF-alpha but not DLG5 are associated with inflammatory bowel disease in a large United Kingdom cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:178–184
  22. Noble CL, Nimmo ER, Drummond H, Smith L, Arnott ID, Satsangi J. DLG5 variants do not influence susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease in the Scottish population. Gut. 2005;54:1416–1420
  23. Torok HP, Glas J, Tonenchi L, Lohse P, Muller-Myhsok B, Limbersky O, et al. Polymorphisms in the DLG5 and OCTN cation transporter genes in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2005;54:1421–1427
  24. Lennard-Jones JE. Classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989;170:2–6
  25. Gasche C, Scholmerich J, Brynskov J, D’Haens G, Hanauer SB, Irvine EJ, et al. A simple classification of Crohn’s disease: report of the Working Party for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna 1998. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2000;6:8–15
  26. Carstairs V, Morris R. Deprivation and health in Scotland. Health Bull (Edinburgh). 1990;48:162–175
  27. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:1215
  28. Clayton D. A generalization of the transmission/disequilibrium test for uncertain-haplotype transmission. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:1170–1177
  29. O’Connell JR, Weeks DE. PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:259–266
  30. Blanchard JF, Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Rawsthorne P. Small-area variations and sociodemographic correlates for the incidence of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:328–335
  31. Duggan AE, Usmani I, Neal KR, Logan RF. Appendicectomy, childhood hygiene, Helicobacter pylori status, and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a case control study. Gut. 1998;43:494–498
  32. Gent AE, Hellier MD, Grace RH, Swarbrick ET, Coggon D. Inflammatory bowel disease and domestic hygiene in infancy. Lancet. 1994;343:766–767
  33. Hugot JP, Alberti C, Berrebi D, Bingen E, Ca C. Crohn’s disease: the cold chain hypothesis. Lancet. 2003;362:2012–2015
  34. Malcolm CA, MacKay WG, Shepherd A, Weaver LT. Helicobacter pylori in children is strongly associated with poverty. Scottish Med J. 2004;49:136–138
  35. Radford JR, Ballantyne HM, Nugent Z, Beighton D, Robertson M, Longbottom C, et al. Caries-associated micro-organisms in infants from different socio-economic backgrounds in Scotland. J Dentistry. 2000;28:307–312
  36. Gavin S, Strange E, Delaney K, Houston J. Child Health Information Team (CHIT), Information and services division Scotland. http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/files/ch_surv_HB_Nov1999.pdf.
  37. Smith C, Burlison A. Closing the gap: Tackling inequalities in health in Argyll and Clyde (available from Argyll and Clyde Health Board, Department of Public Health, Ross House, Hawkhead Rd, Paisley, PA2 7BN) Also available at: www.achb.scot.nhs.uk/reports/closing%20the%20gap.pdf.
  38. Levine A, Shamir R, Wine E, Weiss B, Karban A, Shaoul RR, et al. TNF promoter polymorphisms and modulation of growth retardation and disease severity in pediatric Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1598–1604
  39. Friedrichs F, Brescianini S, Annese V, Latiano A, Berger K, Kugathasan S, et al. Evidence of transmission ratio distortion of DLG5 R30Q variant in general and implication of an association with Crohn disease in men. Hum Genet. 2006;119:305–311
  40. Griffiths AM. Specificities of inflammatory bowel disease in childhood. Best Practice Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;18:509–523
  41. Loftus EV. Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterol. 2004;126:1504–1517
  42. Tenesa A, Noble CL, Satsangi J, Dunlop M. Association of DLG5 and inflammatory bowel disease across populations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:259–260
  43. Arnott ID, Ho GT, Nimmo ER, Satsangi J. Toll-like receptor 4 gene in IBD: further evidence for genetic heterogeneity in Europe. Gut. 2005;54:308
  44. Arnott ID, Nimmo ER, Drummond HE, Fennell J, Smith BR, MacKinlay E, et al. NOD2/CARD15, TLR4 and CD14 mutations in Scottish and Irish Crohn’s disease patients: evidence for genetic heterogeneity within Europe?. Genes Immunity. 2004;5:417–425
  45. Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI. What makes a good genetic association study?. Lancet. 2005;366:1315–1323

 The University of Edinburgh Medical Faculty Fellowship funds R.K.R. This study is supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant (072789/Z/03/Z) with additional support from Schering Plough and the GI/Nutrition research fund, Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh.

PII: S0022-3476(06)01187-5

doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.12.010

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 150, Issue 3 , Pages 268-273, March 2007