Factors regulating gastric emptying in preterm infants
Objectives
To determine whether osmolality, volume, or energy density affects gastric emptying rate (GE); whether simultaneously decreasing osmolality and increasing volume accelerates GE; and whether GE is related to any clinical and/or demographic characteristics.
Study design
GE was measured using the 13C-octanoic acid breath test in 17 infants of 25 to 30 weeks gestation in a tertiary care children’s hospital. In study 1, the independent effects of osmolality, volume, and nutrient density were evaluated in 10 infants. In study 2, the combined effects of decreasing osmolality and increasing volume were evaluated in 7 infants. Results from all infants were used to investigate the relationships between clinical and demographic characteristics and GE. The statistical analysis comprised analysis of covariance, the (paired) Student t-test, the 1-sample Wilcoxon test, and regression analysis.
Results
Mean (± standard deviation) age was 27.7 ± 14.6 days in study 1 and 34.1 ± 14.0 days in study 2. Altering osmolality, volume, or energy density did not change GE, but simultaneously decreasing osmolality and increasing feeding volume accelerated GE by 18% versus standard feeding. GE correlated with gestational age at birth.
Conclusions
Unlike in adults, in preterm infants osmolality, volume, or energy density individually do not affect GE. Reducing osmolality and increasing feeding volume increases GE. GE is related to gestational age at birth even at age 1 month.
Abbreviations: GE, Gastric emptying, GEC, Gastric emptying coefficient, T1/2, Half-emptying time
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Dr. Ramirez wrote the first draft of the manuscript. The funding agencies supporting this work had no part in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This work is a publication of the USDA/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the USDA, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government.
Supported by a grant from the Gerber Foundation to AR (mentored by RJS) and by the USDA/ARS under cooperative agreement 6250-51000-043.
PII: S0022-3476(06)00466-5
doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.05.028
© 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
