The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 149, Issue 1, Supplement , Pages S39-S42 , July 2006

Publication ethics: Editors’ perspectives

References 

  1. Carroll AE , Sox CM , Tarini BA , Ringold S , Christakis DA . Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies’ annual meeting predict subsequent publication? . Pediatrics . 2003;112(6 Pt 1):1238–1241
  2. Kassirer J . When physician-industry interactions go awry . J Pediatr . 2006;149(Suppl):S43–S46
  3. Harris G . F.D.A. Panel Urges Stronger Warning on Antidepressants . New York Times . 2004; September 15
  4. Hartling L , Craig WR , Russell K , Stevens K , Klassen TP . Factors influencing the publication of randomized controlled trials in child health research . [see comment] Arch Pediatr Adolescent Med . 2004;158:983–987
  5. von Elm E , Poglia G , Walder B , Tramer MR . Different patterns of duplicate publication (an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews) . [see comment] JAMA . 2004;291:974–980
  6. Rivara FP , Christakis DA , Cummings P . Duplicate publication . Arch Pediatr Adolescent Med . 2004;158:926
  7. Bauchner H , Sharfstein J . Failure to report ethical approval in child health research (review of published papers) . BMJ . 2001;323:318–319
  8. Klassen TP , Wiebe N , Russell K , et al.   Abstracts of randomized controlled trials presented at the society for pediatric research meeting (an example of publication bias) . [see comment] Arch Pediatr Adolescent Med . 2002;156:474–479

PII: S0022-3476(06)00376-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.050

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 149, Issue 1, Supplement , Pages S39-S42 , July 2006