Indomethacin prophylaxis, patent ductus arteriosus, and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Further analyses from the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP)
Objectives
To determine the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in subgroups of infants with and without patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) who were randomized to indomethacin prophylaxis or placebo, and to examine whether adverse drug effects on edema formation and oxygenation may explain why indomethacin prophylaxis does not reduce BPD.
Study design
We studied 999 extremely low birth weight infants who participated in the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP) and who survived to a postmenstrual age of 36 weeks.
Results
The incidence of BPD in the 2 subgroups of infants with PDA was 52% (55/105) after indomethacin prophylaxis and 56% (137/246) after placebo. In contrast, rates of BPD in the 2 subgroups without a PDA were 43% (170/391) after indomethacin prophylaxis and 30% (78/257) after placebo (P [interaction] = .015). Logistic regression analysis with adjustment for prognostic baseline factors showed that adverse and independent effects of indomethacin prophylaxis on the need for supplemental oxygen and on weight loss by the end of the first week of life may increase the risk of BPD in infants without PDA.
Conclusions
Harmful side effects on oxygenation and edema formation may explain why indomethacin prophylaxis does not prevent BPD even though it reduces PDA.
Abbreviations: BPD, Bronchopulmonary dysplasia , ELBW, Extremely low birth weight , FiO2, Fraction of inspired oxygen , PDA, Patent ductus arteriosus , SD, Standard deviation , TIPP, Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Funded by the Medical Research Council of Canada (grant MT-13288). The US centers were supported in part by NICHD (grants U10 HD21364, U10 HD27851, U10 HD21373, U10 HD27881; M01 RR 00997, U10 HD27880; M01 RR 00070, U10 HD21385, U10 HD27904, and U10 HD34216). The INDOCID PDA was donated by Merck Frosst.
PII: S0022-3476(06)00074-6
doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.01.047
© 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Treatment to prevent patency of the ductus arteriosus: Beneficial or harmful?
