The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 148, Issue 4 , Pages 438-444.e1, April 2006

Early prediction of poor outcome in extremely low birth weight infants by classification tree analysis

Presented in part at the Pediatric Academic Societies’ Meeting, San Francisco, Calif, May 1–4, 2004.

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala, the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Received 6 June 2005; received in revised form 28 September 2005; accepted 30 November 2005.

Objective

To predict death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in extremely low birth weight infants by classification trees with recursive partitioning and automatic selection of optimal cut points of variables.

Study design

Data from the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms were randomly divided into development (n = 784) and validation sets (n = 262). Three models were developed for the combined outcome of death (8 days to 18 months) or NDI (cerebral palsy, cognitive delay, deafness, or blindness at 18 months corrected age): antenatal: antenatal data; early neonatal: antenatal + first 3 days data; and first week: antenatal, first 3 days, and 4th to 8th days data. Decision trees were tested on the validation set.

Results

Variables associated with death/NDI in each model were: Antenatal: Gestation ≤25.5 weeks and antenatal steroids <7 days. Early neonatal: Birth weight ≤787 g and fluid intake >101 mL/kg/d. First week: Birth weight ≤787 g: transfusion >3 mL/kg/d. Birth weight >787 g: cranial echodense intraparenchymal lesion and transfusion >11 mL/kg/d. Correct classification rates were 61% to 62% for all models.

Conclusions

The ability to predict long-term morbidity/death in extremely low birth weight infants does not improve significantly over the first week of life. Effects of different variables depend on age.

Abbreviations: ELBW, Extremely low birth weight, NDI, Neurodevelopmental impairment, TIPP, Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada MT-13288. US centers were supported in part by NICHD U10 HD21364, U10 HD27851, U10 HD21373, U10 HD27881; M01 RR 00997, U10 HD27880; M01 RR 00070, U10 HD21385, U10 HD27904, and U10 HD34216.

PII: S0022-3476(05)01163-7

doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.11.042

Refers to article:

  • Understanding neurodevelopment in premature infants: Applied chaos theory

    William MacKendrick
    The Journal of Pediatrics April 2006 (Vol. 148, Issue 4, Pages 427-429)

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 148, Issue 4 , Pages 438-444.e1, April 2006