The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 155, Issue 4 , Pages 578-583.e13, October 2009

Pediatric Biobanks: Approaching Informed Consent for Continuing Research After Children Grow Up

  • Aaron J. Goldenberg, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
    • Center for Genetic Research Ethics and Law, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
  • ,
  • Sara Chandros Hull, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
    • Office of the Clinical Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • ,
  • Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
  • ,
  • Benjamin S. Wilfond, MD

      Affiliations

    • Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Benjamin Wilfond, MD, Metropolitan Park West, M/S: MPW 8-2, 1100 Olive Way, Room 876, Seattle WA 98101.

Received 8 July 2008; received in revised form 17 February 2009; accepted 10 April 2009. published online 13 July 2009.

Objective

Proposals for pediatric biobanks have prompted questions of whether parental permission is sufficient to continue to use biological samples and data after the children become adults. The objective of this study was to examine adults' attitudes about continued research with their pediatric samples/data, particularly when they could not be located to provide consent.

Study design

Telephone interviews were conducted with 1186 patients from 5 academic medical centers by using a hypothetical scenario.

Results

Most respondents, 799 (67%), would not be concerned about the use of their sample/data after they reached adulthood. Those respondents who were concerned were more likely to be more private about their medical records, less trusting of medical researchers, or African-American. A total of 543 respondents (46%) believed their consent should be obtained to continue using their sample/data for research. Of these, 407 respondents (75%) would be at least moderately willing to give consent, when asked. Of the 1186 respondents, 310 (26%) would not want researchers to use their sample/data when they could not be located to ask for consent.

Conclusion

The data are consistent with the normative view that when feasible, adults should be asked for consent for continued research on their data collected during childhood, but it is generally acceptable to continue to conduct research when adults cannot be located. Further public engagement may help determine how best to balance the potential social value of continued research using pediatric samples/data and the expectations for explicit consent expressed by a minority of respondents that may reflect concerns about privacy and trust.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The study was supported by National Human Genome Research Institute (S.H and B.W.). J.B. received support for the recruitment of subjects. A. G. was supported by the National Institutes of Health (IH P50HG003390, The Center for Genetic Research Ethics and Law). No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, or Department of Health and Human Services. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

PII: S0022-3476(09)00381-3

doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.034

The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 155, Issue 4 , Pages 578-583.e13, October 2009